Week 6: Hedging Strategies §

(F) Day of the week: Saturday Class: IS406 Created Time: February 14, 2022 2:28 PM Database: Events Database Date: March 26, 2022 Days Till Date: Passed Last Edited Time: March 17, 2022 3:53 PM Type: Lecture, Presentation

Goh, E. (2006). Understanding “hedging” in Asia-Pacific security. PacNet No.43, pp.1-2. Kuik, C. (2016). How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), pp.500-514. Lim, J. D., & Cooper, Z. (2015) Reassessing hedging: The logic of alignment in East Asia. Security Studies, 24(4), pp.696-727. Haacke, J. (2019). The concept of hedging and its application to Southeast Asia: a critique and a proposal for a modified conceptual and methodological framework. International Relations of Asia Pacific Studies, 1, pp.1-43. Jason, V. (2014). Power, trust, and network complexity: three logics of hedging in Asian security. International Relations of Asia Pacific Studies, 14, pp.331-356. Ciorciari, D. J. (2019). The variable effectiveness of hedging strategies. International Relations of Asia Pacific Studies, 1, pp.1-33. Tran, B. T., & Sato, Y. (2018). Vietnam’s post-Cold War hedging strategy: A changing mix of realist and liberal ingredients. Asian Politics & Policy, 10(1), pp.73-99. Korolev, A. (2019). Shrinking room for hedging: system-unit dynamics and behavior of smaller powers, International Relations of Asia Pacific Studies, 1, pp.1-34. Medeiros, S. E. (2005). Strategic hedging and the future of Asia‐pacific stability. The Washington Quarterly, 29(1), pp.145-167. Lim, J. D. (2019). Hedging in South Asia: balancing economic and security interests amid SinoIndian competition. International Relations of Asia Pacific Studies, 1, pp.1-34. Liff, P. A. (2019). Unambivalent alignment: Japan’s China strategy, the US alliance, and the ‘hedging’ fallacy, International Relations of Asia Pacific Studies, 1, pp.1-39.