Chapter 6: International Political Economy
IPE = Politics (State) + Economics ( Market)
Studies the interaction between politics and economics in international relations.
Divided into 3 Theories:
- Mercantilism
- Economic Liberalism
- Marxism
I. Mercantilism
1. Assumptions
- Economic activity is the subordinate to building up the state’s power
- Economics is the tool used for political actions
- Economic strength and state’s military-political power is complementary, growing each other
- Economic competition is “zero-sum game”, one must win, one must lose
2. Types
- Benign Mercantilism: States look after economic interests as it’s important to the state’s security (Defensive)
- Malevolent Mercantilism: states attempt to exploit others through expansion (Offensive)
👑 Mercantilism is similar to Neo-Colonialism. Exploiting smaller states with soft power and economies.
3. Modern Examples
- State Intervention: state involvement in national economy to change for better economic system. (protectionism)
- Protection Policy: protectionism (Trade War)
- Productive Power:
II. Economic Liberalism
1. Assumptions (autonomous)
- Markets expand by itself to satisfy supply and demand
- Market economy will operate using its own mechanisms and laws
- The central actors are individuals (consumers)
Principles of Free Market
- Individual Rights: everyone has equal ability to defend our liberty, and participate in economy.
- Limited Government: to secure individual’s rights only
- Equal Justice Under Law: government must treat every individual equally, no ranks
- Subsidiarity: government has the lowest authority
- Spontaneous Order: unregulated supply and demand for individuals ⇒ competition ⇒ best economic benefits
- Property Rights: leave resources to private sectors…?
- The Golden Rule: require honesty between individuals
⚙ Spontaneous Order: is a system when left unregulated, competing buyers and sellers will bring in the best outcome for the economy.
-
When is Government Intervention necessary?
When there is Market Failure.
III. Marxism
Karl Marx thought reforms from Liberalism and Realism aren’t enough. Instead a revolution and overhaul of every system is necessary.
1. Assumption
- Economy is full of Human Exploitation and Class Inequality
- Capitalist based on two actors
- Bourgeoisie: owner of production, middle class
- Proletariats: Owner of Labor power, working class (bound by bourgeoisie)
- Bourgeoisie exploits proletariats
- Demands ‘Social Revolution’ to replace every system
-
Theory of Economics
Surplus value: products’ costs mostly go to capitalists
Workers paid little ⇒ Can’t afford products made ⇒ overproduction ⇒ less employment ⇒ depression ⇒ capitalism collapse
-
Theory of Social Class
Divided of two social classes
The rich: owner of productions
The poor: rely on rich to rain money
The rich will use their power to set up methods which protects their wealth and power
-
Theory of History
Past exploitations of lower classes in history has shown to have collapsed many times.
The collapse of each systems leading from
Feudalism ⇒ Capitalism ⇒ Socialism
Neo-Marxism
1. Cox’s analytical framework
World Orders
Forms of States
Social Forces
2. Dependency Theory
Development of Developing countries rely on development of developed countries
- Primary Commodities: Unfinished products / Raw materials
^
| Primary sold to rich, rich sells back more expensive value-added products
v
Value-added Products: changing primary commodity adding more value to the product
-
MNCs
-
Aids and Support
Richer states can have influence on governance of poorer states through aid
3. World System Approach
Focus on Center-Periphery States
- Core: Rich (West)
- Semi-periphery: Industrializing (NIE)
- Periphery: Poor (East)
Core exploits periphery through neo-colonialism