Hedging Strategies
What is Hedging? 1
- Hedging: is the strategy of betting on multiple alternatives at the same time to act as insurance against one option failing. (from poker)
- In IR: Hedging is a set of strategies states use to avoid a situation in which states cannot decide upon more straightforward alternatives such as balancing, bandwagoning, or neutrality
- Hedging is a norm in IR as insurance policy, to preserve the maximum range of strategic options
- The definite policy elements of hedging are: 2
- Insist on not taking sides among competing powers
- Adopting opposite or counteracting measures alongside normal measures
- The use of the opposite measures as an instrument to preserve gains while cultivating a fallback
- Shifting from or not fitting one of these would be a different strategy such as balancing, containment, bandwagoning, buckpassing, neutrality, non-alignment
- For it to be hedging, the multiple invested options must be aiming for the exact same goal
- Ex: US-Japan alliance + US-India quasi-alliance (territorial issues): does not have the same purpose as US-ASEAN relations for counter-terrorism
Strategy of Hedging 2
- Returns-Maximizing: try to get close to rising powers to maximize rewards
- Economic-Pragmatism: to maximize economic return from a power (ASEAN->China)
- Binding-Engagement: to maximize diplomatic benefits by creating channels of communications (ASEAN→China)
- Limited-Bandwagoning: to maximize political benefits without accepting a subordinate position under the power
- Selective defiance: only accepting some closeness (economic & diplomatic) while rejecting some (military)
- Involve only political partnership
- Work with rising power and existing hegemon
- Avoids losing its autonomy or becoming pawn
- Heiarchy
- Risk-Contingency: to have a fall back by not getting too close (as to bandwagon) by Pursuing contingency measures: investing in the current or another upcoming power
- Economic-Diversification: diversify trade & investment links to avoid dependency (economic hedge)
- Dominance-Denial: minimize geopolitical risks using non-military means to cultivate multiple great power balance (political hedge)
- Indirect-Balancing: forging defense partnerships and upgrading own military, but not targeting a specific country (military hedge)
Return-Maximizing and Risk-Contingency must be used together for it to be called hedging
- The Spectrum of Hedging Behavior Power rejection/acceptance spectrum 2
What states do/don’t hedge? Why? 1
- Why do states hedge: States hedge because uncertain intentions of other states in the future
- When do states hedge?
- Power Transition Theory: ambiguity whether a new power will over take another
- Multipolarity: uncertain about intentions of other powers
- The Complex Network Structure: high sensitivity, fluid alignment structure, hierarchy
- Kenneth Waltz network structure is naturally derived from nature. The
- Extra
- Large states usually hedge and don’t stick their neck out with offensive strategies
- Exception: Case of Large states not hedging: Cold War’s both super powers adopt world dominating strategies
How weaker states hedge? 2
- Small and medium states don’t balance or hedge because its too costly 1
- Hedgers need to analyze the future of other states and its impacts on one’s own future 1
- The Small States Strategies: focus on diplomatic and economic tools of statecraft rather than just military options
- Southeast Asia plans for US downfall + China’s rise
- Investing in China, but not letting it influence too much, in case China fails
Case Studies
- ASEAN-China
- US-China
- China-Vietnam
- China-India
References 3
Footnotes
-
Goh, E. (2006). Understanding “hedging” in Asia-Pacific security. PacNet No.43, pp.1-2. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
-
Kuik, C. (2016). How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), pp.500-514. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
-
Lim, J. D., & Cooper, Z. (2015) Reassessing hedging: The logic of alignment in East Asia. Security Studies, 24(4), pp.696-727. ↩