Chapter 10: Nation-States, ASEAN, and Autonomy
(F) Day of the week: Wednesday Class: IS210 Created Time: June 17, 2020 2:12 PM Database: Class Notes Database Date: June 17, 2020 2:12 PM Days Till Date: Passed Last Edited Time: June 9, 2021 10:42 AM Type: Lecture
Introduction
1. Westphalian Framework
ASEAN holds treaty of Westphalia (1648) ASEAN Way
- Respect of sovereignty
- Non-interferance
- Saving Face
- Consensus Decision making
2. Problems
- Internal Conflict: compete for stronger/survival, picking sides
- Zero-sum game
- Weak: No decision-making/enforcement power
II. State as Actor
ASEAN is a states’ agent: a tool for states to pursue national interests.
- National Interests Regional Norm
- Member States are who have decision making powers, ASEAN doesn’t
- ASEAN doesn’t represent all member states in dealings internationally
III. ASEAN as an Agent of States
Contradicted Theories:
- Constructivism: “Structures comes from collective value and identity”
- Liberalism: “States cooperate, and IOs are influential”
Fits Theory:
- Realism: “States are self-interested, IOs are tools for states, lack of cooperation”
IV. The ASEAN Community
ASEAN remained the same since before 2015
- “Old wine in new bottle”
- Ineffective system/regional organization
V. The Non-traditional Agenda
ASEAN nations express support for democratic norms and human rights
But:
- Endorsement is not implemented by those same leaders in ASEAN nations
- Supporting western norms to gain international support
ASEAN Way does not support democracy
- Consensus based ≠ majority based
VI. Transformation in the Regional and International Environment
ASEAN only deal with insensitive issues and ignore each other’s wrong doings
ASEAN cannot deal with crisis only balance power or preventive methods
VII. The Subordinate Regional States System
Subordinate Role: ASEAN seek world powers to rely on to balance major power competition
- ASEAN member states act separately by supporting different super powers
- ASEAN could break down if the role of ‘Consensus’ continue to disrupt collective decision-makings