Normative Theory

Normative theories define “good” decisions as ones that are most likely to provide the decision maker with desired outcomes, regardless of international norms

  • Actors that try to do more than they can fail, while ones who try to maximize their power will win

    Example 9 11 . US no longer the leader of the world

    World is going through major international order shift after

  • China economic rise

  • India and other countries band together to go against world power (US)?

  • Uni polar world → Multi polar world

    • Chaotic transition period: US tries to keep its leadership position

Some International Norms can be broken by strong states

  • What types of international norms have been violated by Strong State ?
    • Int’ law is only binding and important and perfect on paper, not in practice
      • Strong states are violators of int norms/laws
      • may get condemnation speeches from other states but don’t hurt them physically
  1. The use of force/posession/use of nuclear weapons
    • Why some can possess but some can’t? powerful can.
      • Principle of Sovereingty or non-interferance
        • R2P might be a excuse to why they have nuclear weapons
        • They already posess it so why not use it and abuse it: no external power can stop another state’s government
  2. UNCLOS: China claim 90% of South China Sea Dispute, claim of freedom of navigation
    • Those who created or proposed the norm themselves, are sometimes violators of those norms
    • Mostly violated norms to exploit against weaker states rather than ones that could negaltively affect their interests
  3. WTO rules: violated by almost everyone

What should be done when international norm is violated?

  • other sates may not enter any agreement in the future with violator
  • require changes or make up for violating the law for new agreement
  • Problem: if powerful countries like US and China are main violators of norms, smaller countries would lose much more by not entering agreements with them because they violated.
    • No one would be lead in enforcing rule of law/norms
  • contradicts:: Realism reject importance of Norms because It’s in actors interests to violate them if its not in their interest.
    • not to strictly stick to norms/laws

    Note

    International norms are violated during times of crisis and put ethics or moral issues first