Chapter 7: Southeast Asia in the Regional and International Economies
(F) Day of the week: Wednesday Class: IS210 Created Time: April 29, 2020 2:14 PM Database: Class Notes Database Date: April 29, 2020 2:14 PM Days Till Date: Passed Last Edited Time: February 12, 2022 4:34 PM Type: Lecture
Post-colonist SEA states remain connected to their former colonial rulers through subsistence agriculture
-
Imbalance between cheap agriculture exports and expensive manufactured goods
⇒ Import Substitution Industrialization: local manufacture replacing imported foreign goods
⇒ Export-led Industrialization: produce products locally and export for more profit
-
1980s, SEA ASEAN’s tigers were still small compared to the rest of Asia (China, Japan…)
⇒ 1990s, ASEAN looked to regional integration for a bigger market and voice in the world
I. Intra-ASEAN Regionalism and ASEAN Free Trade Area
1. Intra-ASEAN Regionalism
- 1967, Bangkok Declaration, formation of ASEAN for economic cooperation.
- 1976, ASEAN Bali Summit called for industrialization through
- Market sharing: ?
- Resource pooling: Sharing resource among members
- Regional preferential tariffs: reduce trade barriers in the region
- ASEAN Industrial Joint Venture (AIJV), objected by Malaysia (have own automotive industry)
Lack of Integration
1983, report on ASEAN Cooperation says ASEAN members:
- no intrastate objective
- had no political will
- is self-interested
⇒ 1986, after 19 years still ASEAN members didn’t trust one another
2. ASEAN Free Trade Area
1992 Singapore Summit: first ever ASEAN talk about economic cooperation
- AFTA ran by Common Effective Preferential Tariffs
- Effective: 1st Jan 1993
- Target: of lowering tariff levels 0-5 %
- CLMV joined and had later deadline to comply with AFTA
- AFTA Plus
-
ASEAN Framework Agreement in Services (AFAS): foreign services locally
1995
- Hospitals
- Banks
- Agencies
-
ASEAN Investment Area (AIA): fairly treat foreign investors to stimulate flow of investment
Created: 1995
Applies for both ASEAN members and non-ASEAN members
- Tax exemption
-
ASEAN Industrial Cooperation (AICO): to manage taxation levels of imports
1996
-
Problem of
- how to harmonize the Six and CLMV economies
- Diversity of banking, tax, regulations, judicial systems, corruptions
-
3. The External Impetus
ASEAN concerned over competition for FDI against fast growing China
-
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation
Created: 1989
Aim: promote cooperation in Pacific Rim countries to influence dominant powers
First Meeting: Blake Island 1993
-
Bogor Declaration:
Created: 1995
Aim: for developed countries to open their economies by 2010, and developing countries by 2020
4. The Clash of 1997
China and Japan devaluated their currencies ⇒ their products are cheaper than SEA
- SEA financial crisis 1997
- IMF support program (billions) with conditional reforms: for changes in behavior by countries
- Only Malaysia Rejected: Mahathir paranoid about external interference
ASEAN had no financial institution to deal with financial crisis
Regional Response
-
ASEAN approved Japan’s 100 billion assistance for no condition
ASEAN looked East ⇒ ASEAN+3 (China, Japan, South Korea)
-
The 2000 Chiang Mai Initiative linking ASEAN to China, South Korea, and Japan
-
After financial crisis, ASEAN Surveillance Process created for monitoring and sharing info about financial issues
Pattern of ASEAN Trade and Investment
- ASEAN wanted economic integration to
- expand trade
- attract investment
- ASEAN recovered from 1997 financial crisis
- ASEAN is concerned over the West market as China was rising
- China has cheaper labor
- ASEAN relied on outside markets more than among themselves
Inequality between market of the Six and CLMV
- No institution to promote trust among members
- Competition by CLMV to reduce wealth gap
Economic Regionalism Beyond AFTA
ASEAN intends to promote deeper regional integration
ASEAN views the West protectionism a threat to it’s expansion
- Trump’s focus on unemployment “America First”
- ASEAN pursing both (depending on differing interests)
- FTA through bilateral agreement
- RTA through multilateral agreement
🍜 “Noodle Bowl” different lack of uniform rules of trades that compete with one another making prices higher for consumers
ASEAN strong relation with ASEAN+3
Trade Implication with Politics
- China pursues dominant position with East Asia Free Trade Area
- Japan against China’s influence with Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia
- Obama’s US opposed closed regionalism, advocated Free Trade Agreement of Asia Pacific against China
- Trump’s US imposed protectionism ⇒ Trade War with China
- Global supply chain may shift out of China after Coronavirus
Conclusion
3 Stages of ASEAN’s Economic Cooperation
- The import substitution industrialization
- The export-led industrialization
- Regional Economic Integration
ASEAN’s economic integration relied on FTA and RTA with the weakness of "noodle bowl"
- Weak institution for cooperation and regulation for rules of common good
- Undermines ASEAN regional influence as members are absorbed into China’s and US’s framework
ASEAN has to adapt to the post coronavirus new world order
Discussion Questions
-
Explain ASEAN economic evolution since post-independence to current day.
-
ASEAN has desire for regional integration but ASEAN’s economic outward looking method undermine ASEAN’s integrations efforts.
-
How does coronavirus and US-China Trade War implicate the ASEAN trade prospect in the future?
- Foreign imports in US is taxed (protectionism)
- US retract businesses/Companies from China from both Coronavirus and Trade War
Positive: more foreign companies into SEA from China
Negative: US’s protectionism impacting market accessibility from SEA