Interdependence Liberalism

  • Interdependence Liberalism: interdependent countries rarely voluntarily get in conflict with one another. 1
    • welfare is the primary concern for states
      • Need qualified labor force, access to information, financial capital 2
    • military power more and more irrelevant, powerful states grow with trade, not invasion anymore 1
      • Don’t need to have territory, military, natural resources 2

Division of Market Specialization 2

separate actors specializing themselves in what they’re good at and trading with produce which they’re not good at producing

  • It discourage conflicts as states rely on one another: interdependence makes cooperation more valuable
  • Less likely to use military to solve conflicts: trade agreements and reliance on supply chain makes it a bad decision to go to war
  • Less Developed Countries are more likely to use military to solve conflicts than richer ones

1. Functionalism Theory 2

  • Peace: greater transnational ties could lead to peace
    • Technical Experts, not politicians, should manage cooperation, find solutions to solve them rationally instead of ideologically

2. Neo-Functionalism Theory 2

  • Improve Cooperation: Politicians ****should lead cooperation by shifting their interests to states with similar interests
    • Spillover: increased cooperation in one area will lead to increase in cooperation in surrounding area.

3. Post-war complex interdependence 2

💡 High-politics: the state interests of survival, balance of power, and self interests

Low-politics: the states focus on matters less important than survival of state

Low-Politics is more important than High-Politics

In a world where war is not an option for states anymore because of complex interdependence (from globalization, commercialization, supply chain).

Implications

  1. States pursue separate goals from their transnational actors
  2. Power Resources impacts regionally

IGO’s importance will increase:

  • weak states need platform to raise their voice
  • Coalitions formations
  • IOs will set international agendas

References

Footnotes

  1. Chapter 2 Theories of IR 2

  2. Jackson(2013)IntroductionInternationalRelationsa Chapter 4 Liberalism 2 3 4 5 6