Chapter 1: Historical evolution, sources and barriers of globalization

Class: IS403 Created Time: October 1, 2021 4:39 PM Database: Class Notes Database Last Edited Time: November 29, 2021 9:35 PM Type: Reading Notes

1. When did the term “globalization” become popular?

  • Globalization Coined in second half of 20th century
  • 15th century: ‘Globe’ came from Latin
    • later defined the world as a sphere
  • Global circulated in 17th century and added the meaning of ‘world scale’ in 19th century
  • Globalize and Globalism appeared in 1940s
  • Globalization first used in 1959, in dictionary in 1961
    • Was not popular during the Cold War but did after
  • Globality circulated in the 1980s

1.1. Briefly illustrate the popularity of the term “globalization”.

  • It became popular in recent decades
    • got translated to many languages
    • ideas of globalization it appeared independently in different fields roughly at the same time (1980s) in Sociology, Business, International Relations, Economist, Geographers
    • United States Library of Congress’s mention of ‘globalization’ multiplied from 34 in 1994 to 5,245
    • Now its in education, main concern of global conferences

2. Why is a clear and precise definition of “globalization” necessary?

  • When using the term Globalization, because it’s popular, while not knowing what it clearly means it can be dangerous
    • If you have a negative understanding of Globalization you could be put off from the benefits of globalization or the appeal of it in general (extremist terrorism, interdependence = weakness…)
  • before globalization can be treated as a serious scholarly category, it must be properly have clear, precise, explicit, consistent and cogent conceptualization first.
  • How to know what definition is good? criterias? not in the book.

2.1. What are the criteria of a meaningful definition? Briefly explain.

💡 Criterias of a good definition should

  1. advance new knowledge, teach us something, to describe a new phenomenon, not rebrand an old concept
  2. be as neutral as possible: to be accepted by most groups of people
  3. relative to a context: should describe a new context instead of old one
  4. not be fixed, should be dynamic, open to change
  5. be clear, precise, explicit, consistent, and cogent: supported with empirical evidence

3. What are the weaknesses of the following definitions of “globalization”?

  • Definition of Globalization through Internationalization, Liberalization, Universalization, and Westernization are unoriginal
    • Arguments that build on these conceptions fail to open insights that are not available through pre-existent vocabulary
    • People reject the novelty and transformative potential of globalisation in contemporary history because of these definitions
  • These are the attempts to categorize definitions of Globalization into 4 types:

3.1. Globalization is internationalization.

  • Some authors use internationalization and globalization as synonyms
  • Globalization is a more intense form of globalization
    • ‘old wine in new bottle’ makes understanding the concept confusing, the subtle differences between each.
  • Too state-centric
  • weaknesses
    • Doesn’t fit into all criterias of a good definition
    • too fixed: Have too small a scope, uninclusive
    • State centered, globalization = more actors

3.2. Globalization is liberalization.

  • openness to liberal economy, capitalism, the westphalian model, removal of economic barriers
  • weaknesses
    • too fixed: only refer to economic connections
    • no new knowledge: term already exist ‘old wine in new bottle’
    • too biased: to neo-liberalism, removal of trade barriers,
      • liberal economic policy is not the only and perfect one

3.3. Globalization is universalization.

  • The equality between ethnicity, people, nationality, the spread of sameness
    • Same actions, experiences, language, entertainment…
    • Homogenization, spread of culture/religion, practice diversity all over the world
  • weaknesses
    • no new knowledge: redundant definition of very old concept, cosmopolitanism
    • too fixed: doesn’t recognize politics

3.4. Globalization is westernization.

  • Social structure of western modernity spread all over the world
    • connected with colonization
    • western dominated idea
  • weaknesses
    • biased to western culture: they might not accept that therefore stay away from globalization
    • destroy other non-western cultures:

4. What is the 5th definition of “globalization”?

  • The argument the author support over the earlier 4 definitions of globalization
  • Globalization = The supra-territorial/trans-planetary connection: respatialization
    • space can influence all aspect of your lifestyle
    • trans-planetary: the conncetion exist and apply across the whole planet. Geography, global weather… that surpass border barriers
  • There are 2 Different Spaces:
    • Physical Space: geographic characteristics, distance measurement
    • Social Space: The perception of ease of travel, communication, and closeness between people regardless of physical distance
  • This definition says globalization made social spaces more connected.

4.1. Why does the author argue that this definition is the best of all? Briefly explain.

  • It provides new insights: does not rely on old concepts to define new phenomenon.
    • New insights of Social Space, Trans-Planetary, Trans-Territorial
  • It is more neutral: can be accepted by different groups of people
  • It is open:
  • It is relative to modern context: will apply to the future too
  • It is cogent: traffic jams don’t disconnect people much…

💡 Don’t only use the 5th definition, use all and even the weak definitions according to context you’re analyzing.

  • Ex: use Globalization as liberalization for analyzing a country’s economy.
  • Use weaker/smaller scoped defintions of globalization to easier collect data and scope down topic of research

5. Differences between “global” and “world, international, transnational”

  • Global connection/globailty = Globalization
  • World/International/Transnational connection ≠ supra-territorial/trans-planetary connection
    • World connection isn’t accurate, There are still borders (Countries, North/South…)
  • Global Connection = Supra-territorial connection

6. Various instances of globality in the contemporary era

  • Communication: online/telephone communication, broadcast medias/free-flow of information, online shopping+shipping
  • Production: global supply chain, intermediary products,
  • Military: world reaching weapons, ICMB, spread out military bases
  • Law: Global law enforcement, arrests in different country than the crime

7. Major qualifications to the 5th definition of “globalization”?

(What cautions need to be taken when the 5th notion of “globalization” is applied?)

  • Qualification: refers to the misperception/misunderstanding/exageration to avoid when thinking about globalization
  • Different Misconceptions/Qualifications from the definition of Supra-territorial Connections
  1. Globalism: those who support globalization
    • Their exagerated arguments of a borderless and fully globalized world
    • The world is in the process of globalizing and isn’t borderless yet
      • Trans-border travel requires documentation and restrictions
      • Actors in a nation must still obey laws by government
  2. Reification
    • Misperception: that ‘Global, regional, national, local’ products can be reified/separated. Each part of a product (phone) comes from different spaces
    • CorrectionThe product shouldn’t be identified by all its different parts but as a whole
  3. Global/Local Binaries
    • Misperception: thinking that Global things and Local things are arch enemies and does not complement one another.
      • Extremist Islam makes its thinking in destruction of all other’s social structure
    • Correction: Global things + Local things both complement one another
      • To combine the good parts of Global things and the good parts of Local things to apply to the world
  4. Cultural Homogenization
    • Misperception: a country must protect itself to keep one same identity from being lost.
    • Correction: a culture/identity can be a hybrid or should evolve overtime according to its context and accepting of foreign identity
      • A country’s identity won’t be lost but just evolves
      • Some traditional identity won’t fit social context it requires foreign things (giving cola to monks)
  5. Universality (Cosmopolitanism)
    • Misperception: every people is the same everywhere
    • Correction: thinking there’s global equality means we give up on betterring wealth inequality, social injustices, racism…
      • Glocalization: the combination of globalization and localization. The application of local identity into a new foreign product.
      • People experience different interpretation/variation of the same branded things
  6. Political Neutrality
    • Misperception: globalizations will benefit all people equally.
    • Correction: globalization will inequally affect people, negatively or positively according to geographic position
      • Governments should have redistribution efforts to make people more equally benefited by globalization

💡 Policy makers should look out for these misperceptions when defining what problems needs addressing and not have misperceptions about influences of globalization.